Company thesis
Built for code that has to hold.
Critique exists because AI made code cheaper to produce, but not cheaper to trust. We review the work, preserve evidence, and close the gap between finding and fix.
Scope map
Files visible before agents move
Review board
Specialists share one trail
Patch trace
Fix tied back to a finding
Stop rule
Bounded loops before handoff
Current operating layer
Trust check
scoped
Belief
Autonomywithboundaries.Thatishowtrustisearned.
scope locked
checks required
handoff ready
Review trace
+ evidence attached
+ scope recorded
~ verification pending
Signal
A review should reduce uncertainty, not decorate a pull request.
From reviewer to builder
We started with review because finding the truth has to come before asking automation to act.
Operator note
The system should look as strict as it behaves.
Bounded execution, visible artifacts, clear branch behavior, and no magic claims.
scope
checks
handoff
What exists now
Evidence over vibes
traceA finding should carry enough context for an engineer to verify it fast.
Trust is earned
gateAutomation must show its work, obey scope, and accept when it should stop.
Code before theatre
quietThe interface is quiet because the work is already complicated.
Taste under pressure
craftThe best developer tools feel precise even when the system is busy.
Local control
policyTeams choose policies, models, and whether execution runs in Critique or elsewhere.
Chat
CritiqueChat
Ask repository questions without starting from zero.
Review
CritiqueReview
Run a grounded PR critique with specialist lanes.
Remedy
CritiqueRemedy
Turn eligible findings into validated branch updates.
85%
more review context retained between surfaces
71%
less handoff text needed after structured findings
2.6x
faster path from evidence to repair artifact
< 3m
typical small-patch validation loop target
Close the loop
Better code. Shipped with confidence.
Start with chat, run review, and use Remedy when the fix has enough evidence to act.